Louisiana Literature 2011

Literary festivals, what are they good for? Once you’ve seen one, you’ve seen ’em all, you might say. Sure, a lot of the questions revolve around the same things; ‘how do you write a novel?’, ‘how should readers read you novel?’, ‘what is literature to you?’ – questions, whose answers I pretty much know by heart now. And there is not really any grand surprise when authors say ‘well, I get up at 9, have some breakfast, sit by the computer all day, and hope to have written at least 2 solid pages by the end of the day’. If you want to experience something different though, you have to get in between the creases and observe reactions, the digressions that evolve in the interviews outside the standard questionnaire, like observing audience interaction, author reactions to questions, readings and the expressions and tonality of the readings. So the following introductions are some of the impressions I had of this years Louisiana Literature.

Kjell Askildsen/Helle Helle
Yes, yes, yes, I am getting to the festival itself: there was enough to feast your eyes on. Like for instance a p***** off Kjell Askildsen who closed the ball off with giving us comparative literature students, researchers and all of the critics who label him and others as minimalist writers a flogging during the Kjell Askildsen/Helle Helle interview. Man, he really did not like that label at all! Throughout the interview he was laid back until the point where the interviewer called him and Helle Helle minimalists and then he just let it rip (in that 80-something-years old, half-blind intellectual crazy fashion). I can’t say I blame him in a way; labels can be incredibly restricting and especially if you don’t see why this or that label is tagged to you. But on the other hand; I don’t see literary minimalism as a dirty word, not even an intellectualization of some people’s styles. If you can choose to say a lot with a small amount of words, that’s fine. If you want to use 4 pages to explain the color of your grandmother’s living room carpet, that’s fine too – to me, it’s all in the strength and confidence with which writers write.

Kjell Askildsen – Helle Helle – Christian Lund

Juli Zeh
If you are into dystopia novels you might have found Marc-Cristoph Wagner’s interview with Juli Zeh interesting. The German, Berlin-based author talked about her latest novel, ‘Corpus delicti’ and the obsessive development we see in modern times in any area relating to health issues. And although I didn’t really get a sense of how her novel is different or bringing anything new to the genre of the dystopia novels such as ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ or ‘Brave New World’ (maybe it’s not supposed to) I bought a copy that in this moment is just sitting in wait for me. I especially thought of someone close to me, who has her own theories about the possible detrimental effects of the fanatic attitude people have with health these days – and she might very well be right. She was also very passionate about the topic, so I have a feeling that might just translate onto the novel.


Juli Zeh – Marc-Cristoph Wagner


Carsten Jensen/Ilija Trojanov
If you are a traveling literary soul with a weak spot for having a critical eye to globalization then the Jensen/Trojanov combo is your bet. Trojanov is the author of ‘Collector of Worlds’ and Jensen is most widely known for his ‘We, the drowned’. They both put great emphasis on the experience of traveling – something that evolved from an exiting sensation to something Trojanov explained as painful if you stayed to long and realized you never did fit naturally in with the locals. They both agreed that a journey was endless and goalless. Jensen amusingly said that the two most favorite places a Dane could be was in departures and arrivals of Kastrup Airport, because if Danes didn’t travel they would get claustrophobic. But Jensen is nonetheless a Dane and heavily involved and invested in Danish issues, such as the Danish involvement in the Afghanistan and Iraqi wars, and in debates on culture and academia. Trojanov’s travelling life story on the other hand is that of someone who chose his country rather than being rooted in one, or as he said “a forced travel”. His parents fled Bulgaria and ended up in Kenya and Trojanov now resides in Germany and writes in German.

lija Trojanov – Carsten Jensen – Marc-Cristoph Wagner

Kirsten Hammann
What happens when you stick a lodger, an author lacking inspiration in an apartment with a landlady, a woman waiting for her boyfriend to come home from India, and who also incidentally believes her body’s sole purpose is to produce babies? And what happens when the lodger gets the crazy idea that his next novel should be a detective novel – and what better way of gaining material than to put someone under surveillance? Aka. the landlady who is just sitting alone in her room. Well, Kirsten Hammann’s latest novel ‘Kig på mig’ (Look at me) is what happens. Interviewer Marie Tetzlaff was anxious to know just why successful female authors such as Helle Helle and Hammann chose to let their female characters appear strong on the outside and all kinds of messed up on the inside, I’m guessing to poke at the degree of self-portrayal from a hidden angle, but the question was just left hanging in the air.

Marie Tetzlaff – Kirsten Hammann

Lars Saabye Christensen
One of my favorite interviews was the one Anette Dina Sørensen did with Norwegian author Lars Saabye Christensen. He was there to speak about his latest novel ‘Bernhard Hvals fortalelser’ (Bernhard Hval’s Freudian slips). Bernhard Hval is totally inappropriate – your average anti-hero – completely useless in social settings. An outsider, who teams up with another outsider, a race walker named Notto Fipp with a fondness for a diet consisting of milk and bananas that is quite out of the ordinary (who, incidentally is an actual person). Christensen read a scene from the novel, where Hval and his wife are on their honeymoon in Nice and on one of their outings none other that Knut Hamsun falls down with a heart attack next to them. Naturally, Hval a doctor who prefers the dead, must help in resuscitating Hamsun, although he would much rather let him be. The reading was hilarious and the audience responded well to the narrative. Christensen then spoke of his affinity for Oslo, his home town, and ended the interview by reading ’22 7 2011′ commemorating the victims of the Oslo/Utøya attack. It was so hard to listen to that I had to strain myself so as not to cry. (A reading by Aksel Hennie can be seen here.)

Lars Saabye Christensen – Anette Dina Sørensen


All in all, there was an incredible amount of experiences and impressions at the four-day festival – so much so that I would be writing for many days about it if I didn’t limit myself, so I will stop here. This was not the last literature festival I will be going to.


  1. Reply
    mamma 30/09/2011

    eri í ferð við at lesa Se på mig, men eri komin stutt enn. Tað fyrsta, sum slær meg, er hvussu ósikkur høvuðspersónurin er, sum drongurin fer frá at realisera seg sjálvan ella hvat tað nú er, hann ger. Hon veit innast inni, at hann er farin frá henni uppá ein sera ljótan máta (sum vinkonan roynir at fortelja henni) men hon roynir av øllum alvi at finna upp á túsund ymiskar orsøkir og umskyldningar fyri, hví hann er farin, altso hon ber í bøtuflaka við honum, sjálvt um tað er púra greitt fyri øllum, eisini okkum lesarar, at hon er stórliga snýtt.
    So fyribils er hon als ikki ein sterkur persónur, men tað verður hon kanska, sum bókin líður …
    Mær dámar væl Kirsten Hammann, hon kann kanska tykjast sum lættisoppi, men tá ið tú ehvur vant teg við ehnnara máta at skriva, fært tú eina rúgvu burturúr

    • Reply
      Penciltwister 30/09/2011

      Tað er áhugavert at tú sigur tað, tí tað tosaðu tær eisini vítt og breitt um. Nevnliga hetta at kvinnuligu persónarnir veruliga eru ósikrar og lúgva fyri sær sjálvum konstant. Og at tað var, fyri Tetzlaff, áhugavert at so sterkir rithøvundar sum Helle og Hammann brúktu so nógv hesar nærum skvattutu, sjálvlúgvandi kvinnurnar í sínum skaldskapi.
      Men eg fekk í hvussu so er hug at lesa Hammann, sjálvt um eg eisini havi hoyrt at hon er, sum tú sigur, merkt lættisoppi.

  2. Reply
    Turið 30/09/2011

    Eg haldi at Kjell Askildsen skilti væl hví man kallaði hann minimalist, men mær dámdi so væl tá hann segði, “Hvar skal handan eyka reglan setast?” Hann hevði einki meir at siga, minimalisma var ikki eitt fokus hann nakrantíð hevði havt. Eg í myndi mær, tað kann gerast pissi irriterandi, tá man skrivar fyri teimum sum lesa og tey sum lesa so heingja tín skaldskap uppá orðið minimalismu.

    Inspirerandi, penciltwister. Eg fari eisini til fleiri litteratur festivalar. Serliga tær, ið eru á listasøvnum! 😉

    • Reply
      Penciltwister 30/09/2011

      Nei, men tað var nokk eisini tí hann bleiv “illur” – hann sjálvur vildi ikki klassifiserast sum minimalist tí hann hevur aðrar konnotatiónir til hatta orðið, konnotatiónir sum ikki hóska til tað hann meinar hann ger. Men í mínari verð er minimalisma ikki talan um man hevur nakað meira at siga ella minni at siga, tað er bara mátin man sigur tað uppá.
      Mín favoritt var tá hann svaraði Helle Helle’sa kommentari um at hon ikki bleiv desidera ill av at hoyra seg verða klassifiseraða minimalist, við at siga “Bli det!” Hehe, classique.

  3. Reply

    […] your memory of LouiLit last by checking this post out, or looking through the pictures […]

Leave a Reply